Millionaire Richard Quick, Esq. Launches eBay Drop-off Franchise: iSTOLE IT
Great news for all of you who still love the idea of owning an eBay drop-off store like iSOLD iT, Snappy Auctions, AuctionMeElmo or others, but just don’t have half a million dollars to lose:
Beloved millionaire Richard Quick, Esq. has announce the latest FranWorst franchise opportunity: iSTOLE It!
According to the iSOLD IT press release, “iSTOLE It combines the selling power of eBay auctions with our unique, no-cost inventory acquisition system to unlock multiple window(s) of opportunity for YOU!”
Best yet, the iSTOLE It conversion program is available to failing franchisees and independents that can’t survive on the
cumbersome revenue-share model.
Get in on the ground floor and move up! iSTOLE It is a great entry level opportunity. Many of our ISI franchisees from living in small apartments to The Big House in no time! And many who started with iSTOLE It now also own such franchises as Pruno Prison Wine and H&R Cell BLOCK.
WHAT DO YOU THINK? SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS BELOW.
_________________________
Unhappy Franchisee: Franchising rumors, rants, controversies, issues, complaints & insider information you’re not supposed to know.
Unbiased franchise information, franchise interviews and detailed, searchable information on 400 franchise and business opportunities.
Franchisees, customers & experts vote for their favorite new franchises at Top New Franchise: Who’s hot. Who’s not.
Related Stories
POSTED IN: :-) Humor
4 opinions for Millionaire Richard Quick, Esq. Launches eBay Drop-off Franchise: iSTOLE IT
donna
Jul 22, 2008 at 9:36 am
Hi Sean great post, as always had a laugh. I sent you a new mail as I couldn’t get through on ideafarm hope you got it, let me know.
Donna
sean
Jul 22, 2008 at 10:55 am
Donna:
I got your email. Thanks. Sorry DMW is going to the great blogosphere in the sky. we were just revving up!
I’ll email you. I am a bit preoccupied as I’m in a precarious legal situation after receiving this comment about my iSTOLE It post:
Attorney General Assist
It appears this blog is now crossing the line with false stories created by the owner of the blog to deflame a company.
I saw the line but thought I was supposed to cross it. Like a finish line. Do you think “deflaming” is a serious charge. Is that like “deflowering” a company? Or trying to “rehabilitate” a flamboyant homosexual?
Attorney General Assist
Jul 22, 2008 at 11:53 am
Changing a word in a post from Defaming to Deflaming is in poor taste by the owner of this site.
What Are Defamation, Libel and Slander?
Generally speaking, defamation is the issuance of a false statement about another person, which causes that person to suffer harm. Slander involves the making of defamatory statements by a transitory (non-fixed) representation, usually an oral (spoken) representation. Libel involves the making of defamatory statements in a printed or fixed medium, such as a magazine or newspaper.
Typically, the elements of a cause of action for defamation include:
A false and defamatory statement concerning another;
The unprivileged publication of the statement to a third party (that is, somebody other than the person defamed by the statement);
If the defamatory matter is of public concern, fault amounting at least to negligence on the part of the publisher; and
Damage to the plaintiff.
In the context of defamation law, a statement is “published” when it is made to the third party. That term does not mean that the statement has to be in print.
Damages are typically to the reputation of the plaintiff, but depending upon the laws of the jurisdiction it may be enough to establish mental anguish.
Most jurisdictions also recognize “per se” defamation, where the allegations are presumed to cause damage to the plaintiff. Typically, the following may consititute defamation per se:
Attacks on a person’s professional character or standing;
Allegations that an unmarried person is unchaste;
Allegations that a person is infected with a sexually transmitted disease;
Allegations that the person has committed a crime of moral turpitude;
While actions for defamation have their roots in common law, most jurisdictions have now enacted statutes which modify the common law. They may change the elements of the cause of action, limit when an action may be filed, or modify the defenses to an action for defamation. Some may even require that the defendant be given an opportunity to apologize before the plaintiff can seek non-economic damages.
sean
Jul 22, 2008 at 1:16 pm
As I didn’t change the word, as you state, you would be the defamer. I also assume you copied and pasted the definition without attribution. Add in identity theft by trying to pretend your an Assistant AG of CA.
Assistant to the fry cook, maybe.
While you’re cruising the legal sites for big words, try looking up “parody”
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: