Burger King to Franchisees: Price It Our Way… Or Else
(FranchisePick.Com) A bitter & costly battle with NY franchise owners forces Burger King to disclose its secret retail strategy: Give away the food, screw’m on the Coke.
Siblings Luan & Elizabeth Sadik have been operating Burger Kings for more than a decade, but haven’t turned a profit since 2001. They claim that BK’s 99-cent menu and the more recent dollar value menu were forced down their throats, and made it impossible to survive with the high costs in Manhattan.
The monthly rent at the Sadik’s Fifth Ave. franchise location was $9,000 and $18,000 at their E. 47th St. location. The company also collects a royalty based on gross monthly sales.
Last year, Burger King sued the Albanian immigrants after the Sadiks closed two of their two restaurants without the company’s permission.
Six weeks ago, Burger King closed the Sadiks’ remaining franchise restaurants for allegedly breaching their franchise contract.
The Sadiks have responded with a suit of their own in Brooklyn Federal Court.
According to an article in the Daily News:
“The essence of our complaint is that greed is dictating [Burger King’s] decision-making, not fairness,” said lawyer Oliver Griffith, who represents the Sadiks.
Griffith summed up his clients’ plight this way: If a Whopper hamburger costs $3.50 in Manhattan and a customer can buy two Whopper Juniors for $2 with a value meal, the restaurant operator eats the $1.50 difference…
“The value meal may be a wonderful thing, but with the cost of doing business in a market like Manhattan, the franchise cannot sustain itself,” Griffith said.
…cost food items, which further deteriorates the [Sadiks’] bottom line,” the suit contends.
A Burger King executive, testifying at a deposition, explains the wisdom of the value meal pricing that the franchise owners obviously fail to appreciate:
“It drives people in,” Barry Blum said. “And many people, they come in because, hey, they have this dollar value menu and they buy something for a dollar, but then they also buy a large Coke which has an 80% margin. I mean that’s the way retail works.”
So now you know the way retail works, right from the King’s mouth: Give away the food, but screw’m on the Coke. With a marketing strategy like that, how could the Sadik’s have possibly been unprofitable?
WHAT DO YOU THINK? SHARE A COMMENT BELOW.
SHOULD BURGER KING HAVE THE RIGHT TO DICTATE A FRANCHISEE’S PRICING?
Read the Daily News article: Burger King banishes two midtown sites over value menu dispute
Related Blogs: Burger King Value Menu Sinks Local Franchisees
__________________________
Visit FRANBEST’s: Unbiased franchise information, franchise interviews and detailed, searchable information on 400 franchise and business opportunities.
.
Franchisees, customers & experts vote for their favorite new franchises at Top New Franchise: Who’s hot. Who’s not.
Related Stories
POSTED IN: BURGER KING







2 opinions for Burger King to Franchisees: Price It Our Way… Or Else
michael webster
Mar 5, 2008 at 6:57 pm
So exactly how are those rebates/kickbacks to Coke disclosed in the UFOC?
Clear as mud, I will bet.
sean
Mar 6, 2008 at 3:56 am
Michael:
How is it that Burger King is allowed to dictate the pricing for its franchisees? I thought that was illegal. It was my understanding that franchisors could set a minimum price, but could not set a maximum or specific price. And if there were price-based promotions, individual franchisees or locations could opt-out (”Available at participating Burger Kings.”)
Every franchise system I’ve worked with gave the franchisees the right to set their own prices. That seems like a basic right and responsibility of a business owner. Especially with the inherent conflict of interest with the franchisor benefitting from gross sales, not profitability. Has this changed, or are they just working around it?
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: